naxtwin.blogg.se

1. #Microsoft check for conciseness mac update#
2. #Microsoft check for conciseness mac software#
3. #Microsoft check for conciseness mac Offline#

All of these were once successful cottage industries with a thriving community of rival product vendors striving to produce better products that would capture each others' market share. Microsoft Word grew by acquiring new subsystems: mail merge, spelling checkers, grammar checkers, outline processing. If confronted with a successful new type of software, Microsoft would purchase one of the leading companies in the sector and then throw resources at integrating their product into Microsoft's own ecosystem, if necessary dumping it at below cost in order to drive rivals out of business. One of its tactics became known (and feared) throughout the industry: embrace and extend. Over the late 1980s and early 1990s Microsoft grew into a behemoth with a near-monopoly position in the world of software. Word was in fact broken by design, from the outset - and it only got worse from there. Even though they're fundamentally incompatible and you can get into a horrible mess by applying simple character formatting to a style-driven document, or vice versa. Arguments raged internally: should it use control codes, or hierarchical style sheets? In the end, the decree went out: Word should implement both formatting paradigms. One of his first jobs was to organize the first true WYSIWYG word processor for a personal computer - Microsoft Word for Macintosh.

Steve Jobs approached Bill Gates to write applications for the new Macintosh system in 1984, and Bill agreed.

#Microsoft check for conciseness mac software#

Microsoft was a personal computer software company in the early 1980s, mostly notable for their BASIC interpreter and MS-DOS operating system. In a style sheet system, units of text - words, or paragraphs - are tagged with a style name, which possesses a set of attributes which are applied to the text chunk when it's printed. But another group wanted to use a far more powerful model: hierarchical style sheets.

#Microsoft check for conciseness mac update#

One faction wanted to take the classic embedded-codes model, and update it to a graphical bitmapped display: you would select a section of text and mark it as "italic" or "bold" and the word processor would embed the control codes in the file and, when the time came to print the file, it would change the font glyphs being sent to the printer at that point in the sequence. An ongoing war broke out between two factions. Then, in the late 1970s and early 1980s, research groups at MIT and Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center began to develop the tools that fleshed out the graphical user interface of workstations like the Xerox Star and, later, the Apple Lisa and Macintosh (and finally the Johnny-come-lately imitator, Microsoft Windows).

Programs like WordStar led the way, until WordPerfect took the market in the early 1980s by adding the ability to edit two or more files at the same time in a split screen view. As the first 8-bit personal computers appeared (largely consisting of the Apple II and the rival CP/M ecosystem), programmers tried to develop a hybrid tool called a word processor: a screen-oriented editor that hid the complex and hostile printer control commands from the author, replacing them with visible highlight characters on screen and revealing them only when the user told the program to "reveal codes". These tools were fast, powerful, elegant, and extremely demanding of the user.

#Microsoft check for conciseness mac Offline#

One early and particularly effective combination was the idea of a text file, containing embedded commands or macros, that could be edited with a programmer's text editor (such as ed or teco or, later, vi or emacs) and subsequently fed to a variety of tools: offline spelling checkers, grammar checkers, and formatters like scribe, troff, and latex that produced a binary page image that could be downloaded to a printer. There was an era before Microsoft Word's dominance when a variety of radically different paradigms for text preparation and formatting competed in an open marketplace of ideas. I've been using word processors and text editors for nearly 30 years. Its pervasive near-monopoly status has brainwashed software developers to such an extent that few can imagine a word processing tool that exists as anything other than as a shallow imitation of the Redmond Behemoth. Worse: it is a near-monopolist, dominating the word processing field.

Microsoft Word is a tyrant of the imagination, a petty, unimaginative, inconsistent dictator that is ill-suited to any creative writer's use.